10 Terrible Tech Laws That Have You in Their Bull’s-Eye - loftontreave
Baby porno, cyberbullying, online piracy–these are real-world problems that need solutions. Only does legislating them away work?
You English hawthorn think what your state capital or what Capitol Hill is upfield to is boring and not worth keeping tabs on. But see if you don't get your juices moving later on version how your tech freedoms could represent reined in by whatsoever of the dumb bills we've pinpointed in this story.
If lawmakers Don River't think finished the implications of the legislation they create, they just muck things up further. In point of fact, this raft of bills at the national and state levels–as well as several outside treaty proposals in the works–are outright goosey.
You should be afraid about some of these proposed changes to U.S. police–how will they infringe upon your privacy? And note that a couple of them are in negotiations behind closed doors without public stimulus in the least.
H.R. 1981: Protecting Children from Internet Pornographers Act as of 2022
The Lawmaking: If passed, this legislation could force any business oblation paid Internet access–airports, hotels, coffee shops, and ISPs–to keep records of users' online activities, indeed that if the government ever wants to scrutinize them, it can.
Why It's Horrendous: About the great unwashe deficiency to dungeon kids unhazardous, but having the government spy on everyone World Health Organization uses the Internet is non the answer. You'd think there would be other ways to catch perverts that don't involve much a dreadful infringement on the privateness of innocent people.
Status: H.R.1981 is out of commission; it has been placed along the calendar and is slated for discussion in the U.S. Menage of Representatives at more or less point.
Why You Should Tending: Don River't let the statute title on this same fool you. H.R. 1981, if made into law, will let the government sleuth on and keep records of everything you do online.
Hawaii H.B.2288: Hawaiian Data Memory Neb
The Legislation: H.B.2288 would authorization that any company that provides Internet access in Hawaii–not only ISPs, but coffee shops, libraries and workplaces–proceed ii long time of usage records, including the sites users visited and the IP addresses used.
Wherefore Information technology's Dreaded: We're not speaking close to the womb-to-tomb-terminus tracking of people suspected of a law-breaking, but everyone WHO uses the Web in the entire state of Hawaii. Imagine if all that information got into the wrong men or could be used against people in some way.
Status: The politician who proposed the vizor, Rep. Kymberly Pine, an Oahu Republican and the House minority floor leader, backed push down from the greenback, and IT's been tabled.
Why You Should Care: The Electronic Frontier Foundation, whose motto is "Defending Your Rights in the Digital World," says H.B.2288 "is peerless of the well-nig poorly drafted pieces of data retentiveness legislation" that it has ever seen.
NY S.6779 and A.8688
The Legislation: These bills require a website administrator, upon asking, to remove any anonymous comments unless the person who posted it "agrees to attach his OR her identify to the post and confirms his or her IP address, legal name, and home speak." It also requires that websites make overt in any section where comments are posted a contact number or e-mail service address that people can use to put through removal requests.
Why It's Dread: According to EFF psychoanalyst Rebekah Jeschke, these bills are flatly unconstitutional. "We have a Forward amendment right to mouth off anonymously and for sure people who Host their own websites can resolve that they sole want people to use their real names…Just what you can't do is have the government force masses to verbalise using their real name calling. We have a history of faceless lecture here in the U.S. from The Federalist Papers through with to today."
Status: Both bills are still in commission.
Why You Should Upkeep: Yes, folks who comment online put up be early and cyberbullying is a job, but think how important discourse on a myriad of topics would decrease if people had to companion their name calling with them.
Trans Pacific Partnership
What It Is: U.S. negotiators are pushing for right of first publication measures off the beaten track more restrictive than presently compulsory aside internationalist treaties. According to the EFF, "The Trans-Pacific Ocean Partnership (TPP) is a secretive, multi-nation trade arrangement that threatens to extend restrictive intellectual property laws across the globe."
Why It's Terrible: It's true worse than ACTA (the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement) and puts intellectual place governance in the manpower of lobbyists. The EFF says the TPP will have a broad impact on citizens' rights, the future of the Internet's global infrastructure, and orbicular innovation. And again, this one is being imitative largely without input from the semipublic.
Status: The future disclike of TPP negotiations will be held in San Diego, CA, on July 2-10.
Why You Should Care: SOPA backers such as the Transcription Diligence Tie-u of America (RIAA) and the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA), plus plenty of other material entities, are buttocks the TPP. For more than ugly inside information approximately the TPP, chatter the Have a go at it, where you crapper exercise an machine-driven natural action lively to tell your congressional representatives that you're against the correspondence.
DMCA: Digital Millennium Copyright Act
The Legislating: This one ISN't new, but it's bad enough to deserve a refer. The DMCA successful IT illicit to green groceries and share applied science or services that circumvent digital rights management (DRM) technologies that keep you from using digital content in ways that capacity providers didn't intend.
Why It's Frightening: Instead of working against people stealing copyrighted content, DMCA is oftentimes used against consumers, scientists, and legitimate competitors. For instance, in 2009 Google said that many than half of the put-down notices information technology had received low-level the DMCA were sent by businesses targeting competitors and that to a higher degree united third base were not valid copyright claims.
Condition: The DMCA became law in 1998.
Why You Should Deal: Clearly the DMCA didn't do inaccurate with content pirating, Beaver State we wouldn't still see Hollywood trying to push legislation like SOPA operating theater ACTA.
Next: More bad bills (CISPA, SOPA, PIPA, and more).
H.R 3523: Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA), and S.2151: SECURE IT
The Legislation: These bills try to protect the U.S. from cyberterrorism and other online attacks and would let companies plowshare users' private data with government agencies. Such data would not cost just regarding threats of online attacks; companies would be able-bodied to share users' private data in the event of computing device law-breaking or the exploitation of minors, and to protect hoi polloi from the risk of death OR serious bodily harm.
Why They Are Terrible: The legislation is excessively broad and would allow companies to share people's secret and sensitive information with the government without a indorsement or oversight. Government agencies such as the NSA or other parts of the Department of Defense could and then keep information technology forever and create profiles for not only suspected terrorists, merely regular people besides.
Status: CISPA was passed in the House of Representatives in April. Either CISPA Beaver State SECURE IT will likely come up for a voter turnout in the US Senate soon. The Obama administration has issued a statement saying that if CISPA ends upwards on the President's desk, his senior advisors will recommend that he prohibit it.
Why You Should Care: If the government wants grammatical category information connected users of services, including the satisfied of e-mail messages, it should have to go to a judge and get a warrant. Other than we're looking at a police state. Want to do something about it? PrivacyIsAwesome.com provides several automated tools for reaching out to lawmakers about the issue.
H.R. 96: Internet Freedom Enactment
The legislation: This bill would stopover the Federal Communications Commission from executing along its "Net Disinterest" rules, which object to keep the Internet afford by stopping Internet overhaul providers from doing things such Eastern Samoa throttling Oregon blocking access to the Internet.
Why Information technology's Terrible: According to SaveTheInternet.com, phone and cable system companies are outlay hundreds of millions of dollars lobbying Sex act to axe Net Neutrality so they rump decide "which websites and apps go fast, which go adagio … and which won't load at all."
The site adds, "They want to tax easygoing providers to guarantee speedy delivery of their information. And they want to discriminate in favor of their own apps, services and calm — while slowing devour or blocking competitors' services."
Status: H.R.96 has been referred to the U.S. House of Representatives Subcommittee on Communications and Applied science.
Why You Should Aid: Who wants commercial greed dictating the availability and speed of the Internet? This one is a bad egg.
Nation of Arizona House Card 2549
The Legislation: H.B.2549 is another one intended to playact against bullying and still hunt. It criminalizes the use any physical science or digital twist to commune using "lewd, lewd Beaver State profane language" if done with the intent to "terrify, intimidate, jeopardize, chevvy, annoy operating theater spite."
Why It's Terrible: According to First Amendment rights mathematical group Media Coalition, commenting on the eyeshade's original wording, the broadsheet "… is not limited to a united to ane conversation 'tween two specialised people. The communication does not take to be repetitive operating theater even thrown-away. There is no requirement that the recipient role or open of the speech actually feel pained, annoyed or frightened. Nor does the statute law do clear that the communicating must be intended to injure or annoy the referee, the subject or even whatsoever specific individual."
Status: Governor Jan Brewer signed H.B. 2549 into law on May 14, but only after concerns increased by the Media Coalition were addressed in amendments to the bill. According to the group:
"First, 'annoy' and 'bruise' have been abstracted from the legislating so that the bill would exclusively lend oneself to physical science speech that is motivated to terrify, threaten, intimidate, or chivy. Second, the engrossed to terrify, threaten, intimidate, operating room harass must be of a specific mortal(s) kind of than a unspecialized intent. Third, the communicating must make up directed to the somebody the speaker intends to terrorize, threaten, intimidate, or harass rather than be a general communication. Fourth, the legislation is specific to telephone calls, text messages, instant messages, and netmail."
Why You Should Care: It just goes to show how much we need watchdogs safekeeping an eye happening legislation orgasm down the pike. Kudos to the Media Conglutination for its work getting this atrocity cleaned up in front it went go.
H.R. 3261: Occlusion Online Piracy Enactment (SOPA), and S.968: Protect IP Playact (PIPA)
The Legislating: These federal bills would have allowed rights holders to seek court orders requiring payment providers, advertisers, and hunt engines to stop doing business with websites that infringe copyrighted material so that search links to such sites would equal removed. (For background, see "SOPA and PIPA: Just the Facts.")
Why They Were Terrible: Neither piece of legislation did enough to protect against false accusations. In increase, an open letter of the alphabet to Washington signed past tech industry big shots such as Sergey Brin and Seafarer Dorsey in December pointed exterior that such legislation would "Give the U.S. Authorities the index to censor the web using techniques similar to those victimised by Mainland China, Malaysia and Persia."
Status: After a muckle protest by Web companies and users on January 18, Congress indefinitely delayed further action on the bills, in effect going away them barren in the water.
Why You Should Care: A big thank-you goes to the many companies and millions of even people who stood up to sop these two.
Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Accord (ACTA)
What It Is: As SOPA and PIPA's Big Brother, the treaty would Army of the Pure countries employ a three-strike rule that would postulate Internet users to be cut off off if they continue to download copyrighted material after two warnings.
Why Information technology's Terrible: Unlike SOPA and PIPA, ACTA was crafted in classified. It aims to protect intellectual property but requires highly intruding monitoring of Internet users' habits to come so. It also doesn't admit safeguards, such as judicial oversight operating room the presumption of innocence.
Condition: The agreement becomes authoritative only if ratified by 6 of the 11 signatories: Australia, Canada, the European Community, Japan, Mexico, Morocco, New-sprung Zealand, Singapore, South Korea, Switzerland, and the U.S. ACTA was signed by the European Commission and 22 E.U. appendage states in January, but following protests throughout Europe, many countries reversed their decisions to sign. European Parliament committees latterly voted to reject it.
Wherefore You Should Care: When wide-cut-broad regulations are concocted without public affair, you know something's wrong.
Follow Christina happening Twitter and Google+ for even Sir Thomas More tech tidings and commentary and followToday@PCWorld on Chitter, overly.
Source: https://www.pcworld.com/article/465174/10_terrible_tech_laws_that_have_you_in_their_bulls_eye.html
Posted by: loftontreave.blogspot.com
0 Response to "10 Terrible Tech Laws That Have You in Their Bull’s-Eye - loftontreave"
Post a Comment